Free Press Release DB | Press Release Date : Oct 12, 2017  Download

Our best pick for gaming headsets stay with the accompanying two decisions:

Our best pick for gaming headsets stay with the accompanying two decisions: Kingston's HyperX Cloud Revolver, and SteelSeries' Siberia 350. The two headsets have remained at the best in our diagrams for some time, and this discloses to us a certain something: there are an a lot of average headsets turning out in light of the fact that everybody needs to take part in the headset advertise. Be that as it may, just a modest bunch merit having. You won't turn out badly with either decision. Kingston has another Revolver S show with encompass sound, however I've never discovered encompass empowered earphones ready to keep up great quality sound. Moreover, the impact is no place close as "encompass" as when you're utilizing a genuine arrangement of multi-channel speakers.

It was a tossup between the Revolver and Siberia 350. Both are valued at just around $110 (£80), which places them amidst the pack. Both have phenomenal sound quality that is appropriate for gaming or music. What's more, both are moderately agreeable. In any case, the Revolver is 100 percent simple, giving two 3.5mm links (one for sound, one for mic), while the Siberia 350 is USB. The simple association on the Revolver may make it more advantageous in case you're wanting to utilize an outside sound card or don't have any open USB ports. The Siberia's advanced USB association offers DTS recreated encompass sound incorporated with the headset and in addition LED lighting that is controllable.

The two headsets are unmistakably extraordinary in plan, as well, so you may lean toward either. That settles on them our two best decisions. For those with bigger heads, running with the HyperX Revolver will be the better decision because of a more customizable headband.

Measuring sound quality as of not long ago has been a subjective illicit relationship, which is the reason we went the additional mile in our testing. We utilized $50,000 of sound gear to dispassionately measure a few parts of a gaming headset that are significant to sound quality: recurrence reaction, twisting, and left/right adjust.

Superb sound quality

All around adjusted on bass, mids, highs

Great amplifier quality

Great solace and effortlessly movable

No separable link

No additional ear cushions (like with Kingston's Cloud 2)

The HyperX Cloud Revolver is Kingston's most current headset. It's an uncommon change in sound quality from the Cloud and Cloud 2.It gives the idea that Kingston utilized an alternate OEM totally for the Revolver, and the move was astute.

The Revolver has great sound adjust, great bass, and great detail settling capacity and determination. It's a stark and recognizable distinction, and even shows obviously in the estimations.

There's essentially less bass twisting in the Revolver however bass is still conveyed with quality. The "pummel" is firmly controlled and stretches out down low, while never obfuscating out the other frequencies.In the higher frequencies, Kington's settled the score in the vicinity of 3kHz and 6kHz. Subtle elements now come through unmistakably, and the Revolver is even aggressive here with typical music earphones. Since the homeless people are better exhibited in the Revolver, it has the best soundstage of any of Kingston's offerings.

No detcahable mic

Somebody at SteelSeries comprehends earphones. The organization's whole scope of Siberia headsets, from the 200 the distance to the 800, sound better than average. For the $120 Siberia 350, you get a ton of sound goodness for the cash.

There's great adjust of sound in the entire recurrence extend. Bass is tight and melodic, in spite of the fact that the earphones will perform better with an alternate headband. The headband is auto altering and tends to pull upwards, in this manner lifting the base seal of the ear cushions. Fixed legitimately notwithstanding, and the Siberia 350 can contend with hello there fi earphones.

Soundstage is great on the 350, even without DTS modes turned on. The Siberia 350 accompanies DTS Headphone X, which has distinctive modes for gaming and music. Be that as it may, you're in an ideal situation leaving those modes killed totally—the soundstage of the Siberia 350 is as of now very much characterized.

Tonally, the Siberia 350 is warm, positively. The bass, mid-range, and high frequencies function admirably together to deliver a satisfying sound without cruelty. As such, the headset has great profundity. Determination is likewise great, and I could plainly hear all the little subtleties in the test tracks.


How we tried gaming headsets and others we tried

Our framework is comprised of two essential segments: the head and middle test system (HATS), and the real testing programming. On the equipment side, Bruel and Kjaer provided the HATS, which is broadly utilized by military, car, and sound businesses. The genuine testing and examination is performed utilizing a modern programming known as SoundCheck, by Listen Inc. I've itemized both in my past article paving the way to this one, however I needed to grow a bit on the work that was finished with SoundCheck.

Created in light of profound investigation, SoundCheck is intended for engineers that need to completely control how tests are run. Basically, you can consider SoundCheck a best in class analyzer that is completely programmable. I wound up investing a decent measure of energy with both documentation and Listen's designers to get prepared on what certain tests say in regards to a headset, and how to perform them.

That is the reason we wound up getting ourselves a $50,000 testing stage. This stage is utilized by the absolute most very much regarded building organizations on the planet.

How we tried

On the off chance that we were simply trying just a modest bunch of headsets, it would be simple. In any case, experiencing approximately 60 units is overwhelming. Gratefully, SoundCheck permits a specific level of mechanization. I wound up making my own test succession in SoundCheck that would request a model name, perform different tests, yield the graphs, and spare the outcomes to document consequently. To test the amplifiers, another grouping was made that would clear the mic, play a pre-characterized WAV document, record the sound outcome, and spare both the recorded info and outline to record with the right model names.

When we were through trying, we understood we had scarcely touched the most superficial layer of SoundCheck's capacities. For mechanical building, Listen's valuing of SoundCheck practically appears like a can foresee its capacities. All things considered, it's not something a home client would utilize, unless you're a sound designer in your normal everyday employment.

Following quite a while of testing, we at last have comes about. We utilized both the test framework and my own particular listening tests for every headset and earphone tried. Altogether, we spent around 4 hours for every unit. For reference, the accompanying tracks and collections were utilized:

All track and collection sources are in lossless FLAC organize, at either 24-bit/192kHz, 24-bit/96kHz, or 16-bit/44.1kHz. As you may have seen, I picked an assortment of classifications and I tuned in to every earphone crosswise over 3 distinctive earphone intensifier and DACs:

- Schiit Gungnir multi-bit DAC with Mjolnir 2 earphone amp - Oppo HA-1 DAC/earphone amp - Woo Audio WA7d Fireflies DAC/earphone amp

For our headsets, we scored each out of 10 for sound, and solace, with a score of 5 being normal.

For receiver tests, we utilized a reference WAV document recorded with an AKG P220 proficient condenser mouthpiece. The WAV document was then foreign made into a SoundCheck succession where it played through the mouth test system on the HATS. A chronicle of that yield was then put something aside for every earphone to think about lucidity, contortion and reaction.


We put many hours into the testing of earphones and assembled many them all the while. Many models from many brands did not make the cut, but rather on the off chance that you need to see the outcomes and estimations from every one of them, investigate this article here, which goes into more fine grained detail for every headset, including how they stack up against our decisions in this article.

Contact Person & Company



jimmy wales



Contact Numbers

Telephone No.


Fax No.


Handphone No.



Website 1


Go To PR Site

Website 2




PR Tags






Contact The Author

Contact Jimmy Wales


The author of the press releases are solely responsible for the content of their press releases. can't be held liable for the content posted by author. Please check the accuracy of the press release before using the press release. If necessary please contact the author. Thank you.

Report Abuse